14
$\begingroup$

Just a note that Stack Overflow is looking to give away their closed questions on theoretical (i.e. non-programming) aspects of ML to Cross Validated:

I guess that Data Science SE may be also interested in hosting some of these questions, hence this post here.

I was not at all involved (in fact I have argued in SO Meta that we should keep them there, but I am clearly with the minority), but to the best of my knowledge, no other relevant SE site (namely AI and Data Science) has been asked if they would possibly be interested to receive some of them, too.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 6
    $\begingroup$ Thank you. I saw that post on SO Meta. I upvoted your answer. However I agree with your analysis that you are in the minority opinion, and think that advocating for bringing them here is likely an even steeper uphill battle than leaving them in place. $\endgroup$
    – Stephen Rauch Mod
    Commented Jan 29, 2021 at 0:03
  • $\begingroup$ I don't think it would hurt to express an interest (and I did so, but a DS moderator would carry more weight). But, I did look through the top-voted closed questions with tag machine-learning, and I do think most of those belong better at CV. If they continue making a list, I'll check in now and again. $\endgroup$
    – Ben Reiniger Mod
    Commented Feb 5, 2021 at 16:01

0

Reset to default

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .